Visit Scott (Scoop) Butki's column >>

SCOTT (SCOOP) BUTKIHome Page

A cynical idealist; To Read Me Is to Know Me (Mostly)
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 1176; Links Seeded: 7571
Member Since: 2/2007Last Seen: 11/28/2009

Apple removes I Am Rich, a $1,000 featureless iPhone application

Read ArticleArticle Source: The L.A. Times
advertisement

Wow, talk about a dumb move. What were they thinking?

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
2.6
{"commentId":2398657,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}

Eight iPhone owners have joined an elite clan: Their gadget is running a program that cost nearly $1,000.

When the iPhone first hit the market in June 2007, those who paid the $499 entry price -- and signed the two-year AT&T contract -- owned a status symbol. A year later, we have the iPhone 3G, Apple Inc.'s speedier, sleeker and, most important, less expensive smart phone, which introduced a section for downloading third-party applications.

Now that the phone is affordable enough for a wider audience, a new status symbol has emerged: a seemingly useless application called I Am Rich.

Its function is exactly what the name implies: to alert people that you have money in the bank. I Am Rich was available for purchase from the phone's App Store for, get this, $999.99 -- the highest amount a developer can charge through the digital retailer, said Armin Heinrich, the program's developer.

{"commentId":2398657,"threadId":"328086","contentId":"1731252","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Fri Aug 8, 2008 7:55 AM EDT
{"commentId":2399480,"authorDomain":"writingathena"}

Maybe they pulled "I Am Rich" so that they can replace it with "I Am a Buffoon"

{"commentId":2399480,"threadId":"328086","contentId":"1731252","authorDomain":"writingathena"}
  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Fri Aug 8, 2008 9:58 AM EDT
{"commentId":2400089,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}

Heh

{"commentId":2400089,"threadId":"328086","contentId":"1731252","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Fri Aug 8, 2008 11:00 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":2398853,"authorDomain":"zydor"}

The real sad thing about this - apart from the obvious insanity of those who paid $1,000 each for a status symbol that only the most simpled mind Ostrich could believe in, is the underlying message behind doing it in the first place.

The "truly" rich don't - by in large - bother with such puerile symbols, they hardly have a need to. Its the number of those who like to pretend they are rich and are in love with this kind of Ostrich like symbol, that Apple's Marketing machine dug up in surveys; else they would not have done it in the first place.

That indicates a considerable number of people who actually believe that other people are impressed by such drivel, and that's the Really Sad Thing when you think about it ......

{"commentId":2398853,"threadId":"328086","contentId":"1731252","authorDomain":"zydor"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Fri Aug 8, 2008 8:36 AM EDT
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"328086","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"328086","contentId":"1731252"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking