Visit Scott (Scoop) Butki's column >>

SCOTT (SCOOP) BUTKIHome Page

A cynical idealist; To Read Me Is to Know Me (Mostly)
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 1176; Links Seeded: 7571
Member Since: 2/2007Last Seen: 11/28/2009

Discussion: What's Your Take On This New Yorker Cover? Offensive? Funny?

Read ArticleArticle Source: The Huffington Post
advertisement

I seeded an interview with the editor

Here's one columnist's take

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.5
{"commentId":2186436,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}

Thoughts?
Too incendiary?

{"commentId":2186436,"threadId":"312688","contentId":"1664237","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
    Reply#1 - Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:40 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2186665,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}

    This is what the editor had to say:

    This cover has quickly become very controversial. The Obama campaign has called it "tasteless and offensive." Why did you run it?

    Obviously I wouldn't have run a cover just to get attention — I ran the cover because I thought it had something to say. What I think it does is hold up a mirror to the prejudice and dark imaginings about Barack Obama's — both Obamas' — past, and their politics. I can't speak for anyone else's interpretations, all I can say is that it combines a number of images that have been propagated, not by everyone on the right but by some, about Obama's supposed "lack of patriotism" or his being "soft on terrorism" or the idiotic notion that somehow Michelle Obama is the second coming of the Weathermen or most violent Black Panthers. That somehow all this is going to come to the Oval Office.

    The idea that we would publish a cover saying these things literally, I think, is just not in the vocabulary of what we do and who we are... We've run many many satirical political covers. Ask the Bush administration how many.

    {"commentId":2186665,"threadId":"312688","contentId":"1664237","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
      Reply#2 - Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:56 PM EDT
      {"commentId":2196013,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}
      {"commentId":2196013,"threadId":"312688","contentId":"1664237","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
        Reply#3 - Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:40 AM EDT
        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"312688","isPrivate":false}
        Leave a Comment:
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
        {"threadId":"312688","contentId":"1664237"}
        Start TrackingStart Tracking
        Stop TrackingStop Tracking