Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Scott (Scoop) Butki's column >>

SCOTT (SCOOP) BUTKI

Home Page
A cynical idealist; To Read Me Is to Know Me (Mostly)
Articles Posted: 1426  Links Seeded: 10249
Member Since: 2/2007  Last Seen: 5/16/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

What Does The New York Times Decision To Fold TimesSelect Say About The Death of Paid Content?

Seeded on Wed Aug 8, 2007 12:44 PM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: Publishing
us-news, content-distribution, business-august
Seeded by Scott (Scoop) Butki
Advertise | AdChoices

Excerpt: "The New York Times has reportedly decided to abandon TimesSelect, its experiment with paid content on the web. This comes as no surprise since the pay wall was controversial, both internally and externally, from the beginning, but it's even less surprising when you look the at the fundamental economics of content in the digital media age that may soon put the final nail in the coffin of paid content.

The ability to charge for content in non-digital media like newspapers, magazines, and cable TV was based on a limited supply of content and monopoly control of distribution. The web and digital media have generated an overabundance of content — not just a spike in high-quality content but, more disruptively, and even larger spike in "pretty good" or "good enough" content. The web has of course utterly destroyed destroyed distribution monopolies. Anyone can create and distribute content on a meaningful scale.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Scott (Scoop) Butki's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Mediavine, MSM Incinerator
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (8)
Scott (Scoop) ButkiDeleted
Scott (Scoop) Butki

I'm not sure this news - o fwhich I'm quite grateful and not just because I publicly
ridiculed it a year ago - means the end of paid content but it means the failure
of one of the more public experiments.

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Wed Aug 8, 2007 12:51 PM EDT
Scott (Scoop) Butki

Epi was first (as far as I saw) to break this great news here but I like this piece for adding more context to it.

  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Wed Aug 8, 2007 1:00 PM EDT
ShaunV

Many commenters below have rightly observed that paid content still thrives in niches, which makes sense in economic terms — the smaller the niche, the more scarce good content is, so the more likely people are to pay for it.

I think this is true.

There are still many paid oportunitites for specialized topics.

  • 1 vote
Reply#4 - Wed Aug 8, 2007 4:18 PM EDT
Scott (Scoop) Butki

Wouldn't porn count as paid content?

  • 2 votes
Reply#5 - Wed Aug 8, 2007 4:38 PM EDT
ShaunV

I don't know.

I think publishers are likely to pay for writers to write about boring niche topics.

  • 1 vote
#5.1 - Wed Aug 8, 2007 4:41 PM EDT
Reply
Scott (Scoop) Butki

One of the ironies of my life lately is that because I write reviews and interviews for free at places like this it becomes harder for me to get paid to write reviews and interviews. It's ultimately self-defeating.
It's the one wounding dig Andrew Keen got in at me when attempting to attack the culture of the Internet in this interview.

    Reply#6 - Wed Aug 8, 2007 5:10 PM EDT
    Scott (Scoop) Butki

    I seeded two other pieces about this here

    and here, where the WSJ might/should/could go free next

      Reply#7 - Thu Aug 9, 2007 11:44 PM EDT
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      FUN STUFF:
      • Leaderboard |
      • E-Mail Alerts |
      • Top of the Vine |
      • Newsvine Live |
      • Newsvine Archives |
      • The Greenhouse |
      COMPANY STUFF:
      • Code of Honor |
      • Company Info |
      • Contact Us |
      • Jobs |
      • User Agreement |
      • Privacy Policy |
      • About our ads
      LEGAL STUFF:
      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com